StopBlaming Whitey

[Previous entry: "White's opinion on race issues "Neither here nor there?""] [Next entry: "Don't you ever disrespect a black woman like that again!"]

09/27/2008: "Obama doesn't like what you say? Prosecute!"

###UPDATED 9/27/08, 9/28/08, ###

Apparently Obama is not liking when the truth keeps hitting him in the face. So much so that he now has a team of prosecutors and Sherrifs in Missouri who have formed a truth squad, so to speak, to hunt down and prosecute people who are against what Obama stands for. The issue mainly at hand is Obama's documented stand against gun ownership rights.

Linked below is an article which details this ridiculous attempt at censorship. The individuals claim they are going after ads that falsely claim Obama is against gun rights for individuals. I suppose they are trying to get across that Obama is indeed gun owner friendly. Here is the deal! Obama has always been against gun owner rights and the following video spells this out.

In the video below Megyn Kelly of FOX News grills an Obama spokesperson on Obama's stand on gun ownership rights. She points out Obama signed, in his own handwriting, a document which asked the question, "Do you support state legislation to ban the manufacture, sale, and possession of hand guns?" Megyn indicates Obama's written answer was yes. As the spokesperson tries to back peddle and interrupt she points out again there was an amended document asking the same question, where Obama again signed and wrote with his own handwriting he was still opposed to gun rights.

The spokesperson never addresses these facts; he continues to try to turn the conversation around stating Obama is FOR gun owner rights. How can he be FOR something NOW that he has been decidedly against in the past?

Watch the video first, then visit the link to to read the article.



Read the article here.

In the article a blogger says, "Don't think they will stop with just the local radio and television stations. Oh, no. We bloggers are NEXT on the chopping block! It doesn't matter if it is the truth. It only matters if Obama deems it a lie (i.e. �" something that can cause damage to his bid to be president). Basically, NO ONE is free to criticize Obama here in Missouri!!!"

Well, there are too many bloggers, and most of them don't live in Missouri. So good luck with that Obama.

With Obama, no one truly knows what they are going to get. Its frightening to contemplate how many other things we don't know about him that will only come through if he becomes our leader. Gun owner rights is just one issue. Its important to many, but far from the only issue the Obama camp is trying to hide from the public that Obama waffles on. Lets face it, the liberal media and Obama supporters believe the less news that gets out to the public about the truths of Obama the better. The race is close right now. Too close for their comfort. If people are allowed to remain ignorant to the real Obama, he may just have a chance.

Let all do our parts to make sure ALL truths are freely available to the public about this man who may very well destroy America from the top down. Fellow bloggers and website owners, please share this and other truths about Obama as much as possible. They may be able to shut a few of us down, but not all of us.

Links to other perspectives on this issue:

• The Questionaire "in question" Make note of his support for affirmative action.
  
• NRA
  
• GunBanNObama
  
• Ben Smith Blog "Obama seeks to take down NRA ad" Make sure you click on the links in the article, and click the "Continue reading..." link to see letters, facts, and more info on the subject.
  
• Fact-Checkers Fall Short in Criticizing NRA's Anti-Obama Ads
  
• Instapundit
  
• Cantankerous Old White Guy
  
• All White Nation
  
• Gateway Pundit
  
• Doctor Bulldog & Ronin
  
• Suggest a link below and it will be added here!

UPDATED:

ADDED 9/28/08: Read Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement

ADDED 9/27/08: As said in an article written by Robert D. Novak on June 30, 2008 regarding Obama's claim to ignorance on the D.C. ban on handguns:

"The issue will return when Chicago's handgun ban, modeled after the Washington law, is challenged in the courts. As a Chicago lawyer, Obama can hardly plead ignorance as he did concerning the D.C. ban. But with the case wending its way back to the Supreme Court for the next year, Obama will not have to answer the question before November."

"While Scalia's opinion for now saves Obama from defending a court that had emasculated gun rights, one inconvenient truth confronts the candidate. He has made clear that as president he would nominate Supreme Court justices who agree with the minority of four that the Second Amendment is meaningless. Would he want a reconstituted court to roll back the D.C. decision when the Chicago case gets there?"